Computing and plotting engineering constants ============================================ This page illustrates how one can create stiffness (or compliance) tensors, manipulate them and plot some elasticity-related values (e.g. Young modulus). Direction-dependent Young moduli -------------------------------- First, create a stiffness tensor with a given symmetry (let say, monoclinic): .. doctest:: >>> from Elasticipy.FourthOrderTensor import StiffnessTensor >>> C = StiffnessTensor.monoclinic(phase_name='TiNi', ... C11=231, C12=127, C13=104, ... C22=240, C23=131, C33=175, ... C44=81, C55=11, C66=85, ... C15=-18, C25=1, C35=-3, C46=3) Let's investigate the Young modulus: >>> E = C.Young_modulus Here ``E`` is a ``SphericalFunction`` object. It means that its value depends on the considered direction. For instance, let's see its value along the x, y and z directions: >>> Ex = E.eval([1,0,0]) >>> Ey = E.eval([0,1,0]) >>> Ez = E.eval([0,0,1]) >>> print((Ex, Ey, Ez)) (124.52232440357189, 120.92120854784433, 96.13750721721384) Actually, a more compact syntax, and a faster way to do that, is to use: >>> import numpy as np >>> print(E.eval(np.eye(3))) [124.5223244 120.92120855 96.13750722] To quickly see the min/max value of a ``SphericalFunction``, just print it: >>> print(E) Spherical function Min=26.283577707639264, Max=191.396591469876 It is clear that this material is highly anisotropic. This can be evidenced by comparing the mean and the standard deviation of the Young modulus: >>> E_mean = E.mean() >>> E_std = E.std() >>> print(E_std / E_mean) 0.45580071168605646 Another way to evidence anisotropy is to use the universal anisotropy factor [1]_: >>> C.universal_anisotropy 5.1410095516414085 Shear moduli and Poisson ratios ------------------------------- The shear modulus can be computed from the stiffness tensor as well: >>> G = C.shear_modulus >>> print(G) Hyperspherical function Min=8.748742560860673, Max=86.60555127546397 Here, the shear modulus is a ``HyperSphericalFunction`` object because its value depends on two orthogonal directions (in other words, its arguments must lie on an unit hypersphere S3). Let's compute its value with respect to X and Y directions: >>> print(G.eval([1,0,0], [0,1,0])) 84.88888888888889 The previous consideration also apply for the Poisson ratio: >>> print(C.Poisson_ratio) Hyperspherical function Min=-0.5501886056193359, Max=1.4394343811865082 Plotting -------- Spherical functions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In order to fully evidence the directional dependence of the Young moduli, we can plot them as 3D surface: >>> E.plot3D() # doctest: +SKIP .. image:: images/E_plot3D.png :width: 400 It is advised to use interactive plot to be able to zoom/rotate the surface. For flat images (i.e. to put in document/articles), we can plot the values as a Pole Figure (PF): >>> E.plot_as_pole_figure() # doctest: +SKIP .. image:: images/E_PF.png :width: 400 Alternatively, we can plot the Young moduli on X-Y, X-Z and Y-Z sections only: >>> E.plot_xyz_sections() # doctest: +SKIP .. image:: images/E_xyz_sections.png :width: 600 Hyperspherical functions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hyperspherical functions cannot plotted as 3D surfaces, as their values depend on two orthogonal directions. But at least, for a each direction **u**, we can consider the mean value for all the orthogonal directions **v** when plotting: >>> G.plot3D() # doctest: +SKIP .. image:: images/G_plot3D.png :width: 400 Instead of the mean value, we can consider other statistics, e.g.: >>> G.plot3D(which='min') # doctest: +SKIP .. image:: images/G_plot3D_min.png :width: 400 This also works for ``max`` and ``std``. These parameters also apply for pole figures (see above). When plotting the X-Y, X-Z and Y-Z sections, the min, max and mean values are plotted at once: >>> G.plot_xyz_sections() # doctest: +SKIP .. image:: images/G_xyz_sections.png :width: 600 .. note:: If you want to perform all the above tasks in a more interactive way, check out the :ref:`GUI`! .. [1] S. I. Ranganathan and M. Ostoja-Starzewski, Universal Elastic Anisotropy Index, *Phys. Rev. Lett.*, 101(5), 055504, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.055504